2009 NFL Week 2 Beatpath Rankings

Ranking for Week 2 – note we’re still using an inferior tie-breaker as we wait for things to shake out a little more. We respect the beatpath graph, and otherwise rely on the previous week’s rankings. This means that if a previous season’s “bad” team beats a previous season’s “good” team, the losing teams sink quickly, and winning teams rise slowly.

Rank Team Notes Last Week BeatPower

1

(Beat MIA) Indianapolis retains the top spot after a weirdly efficient offensive game Monday night.

1

100.0

(2/2 – 0/2)

2

(Beat NE) The Jets curiously continue to retain the ranking spot they climbed to last season.

2

100.0

(5/5 – 0/5)

3

(Beat DAL) Close game – there should be a law against beating a team for their stadium opener game. Bad omen!

5

100.0

(4/4 – 0/4)

4

(Lost to NYJ) New England climbs, due to the collapse of Pittsburgh and Tennessee.

6

66.7

(2/3 – 1/3)

5

(Beat SD) That was a crazy play at the end by Ray Lewis. Even on the replay I couldn’t fathom how fast he moved there.

7

100.0

(3/3 – 0/3)

6

(Lost to NYG) Dallas still stays in the top ten after the loss.

8

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

7

(Beat CLE) Denver beats Cleveland as expected. Since we’re still relying on previous-week rankings, they don’t rise as much as they could – other variants have them ranked #1.

9

100.0

(6/6 – 0/6)

8

(Beat DET) Minnesota wins, but it’s hard to judge quality based off of the quality of their wins.

10

100.0

(2/2 – 0/2)

9

(Beat TEN) Houston demolished Tennessee, which either means Houston is good, or Tennessee is really bad. This week’s rankings are choosing to see Tennessee as bad.

11

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

10

(Beat CAR) Atlanta wins again, and face a more defining test this weekend against New England.

12

100.0

(2/2 – 0/2)

11

(Lost to IND) That was a close one, but beatpaths still thinks Miami is pretty good.

13

0.0

(0/2 – 2/2)

12

(Beat GB) Adam Schefter thinks Cincinnati is a real contender this season.

14

80.0

(4/5 – 1/5)

13

(Beat SEA) A strange game of the week this week – San Francisco at Minnesota. It’s quite possibly a mirage.

15

100.0

(4/4 – 0/4)

14

(Beat JAC) I’m not quite ready to trust Arizona yet – in week 1 they played the same as they did all preseason, and then week 2 they sort of magically appeared. Whether they have staying power remains to be seen.

16

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

15

(Beat TB) Finally, some shakeups in the rankings. Buffalo beats Tampa Bay…

20

33.3

(1/3 – 2/3)

16

(Lost to BUF) making them swap places in the rankings…

19

0.0

(0/5 – 5/5)

17

(Beat PHI) and New Orleans defeats Philadelphia…

21

100.0

(3/3 – 0/3)

18

(Lost to NO) leaving Philadelphia as the team that loses the most power of the four.

17

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

19

(Lost to ATL) I remember some thinking Carolina would be pretty good, but I don’t have a sense of their identity changing much over the last few seasons. Maybe they’re just aging.

18

0.0

(0/3 – 3/3)

20

(Lost to BAL) Back to normal with the rankings – San Diego rises two due to the collapses of Pittsburgh and Tennessee.

22

66.7

(2/3 – 1/3)

21

(Beat STL) Did the Washington fans really boo Washington while they were winning? Just because their opponent was St. Louis? That’s a new benchmark in fan behavior. It must suck to be St. Louis.

23

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

22

(Lost to DEN) Cleveland holds steady (relatively) after the expected loss to Denver.

24

0.0

(0/2 – 2/2)

23

(Beat KC) Oakland was actually favored over Kansas City, so their win doesn’t make them look like a tougher opponent for Denver than they did last week.

25

33.3

(1/3 – 2/3)

24

(Lost to ARI) In Jacksonville’s defense, good-Arizona is pretty darn good.

26

0.0

(0/3 – 3/3)

25

(Lost to CIN) Green Bay was actually ranked pretty poorly before this game, and Cincinnati was favored according to beatpaths. Of course, that has something of an effect…

27

60.0

(3/5 – 2/5)

26

(Beat PIT) … in that that also keeps Chicago down. The ranking tiebreakers are a bit pick-your-poison this early in the season.

28

40.0

(2/5 – 3/5)

27

(Lost to CHI) And since Chicago beat Pittsburgh, that makes Pittsburgh collapse, particularly since Pittsburgh’s sole win so far…

3

20.0

(1/5 – 4/5)

28

(Lost to HOU) is against a winless team that has lost to another team with beatlosses. So, a major reorganization of the rankings this week.

4

0.0

(0/7 – 7/7)

29

(Lost to OAK) The rest of the rankings are as they were before. Kansas City still looks like they are casting about.

29

0.0

(0/3 – 3/3)

30

(Lost to SF) Seattle has won once, but you don’t get much credit for defeating St. Louis.

30

50.0

(1/2 – 1/2)

31

(Lost to MIN) Detroit holds steady – I wonder what would happen if they played St. Louis? I mean, cosmically.

31

0.0

(0/2 – 2/2)

32

(Lost to WAS) But on the other hand, did they actually hold Washington to such a low point total, or was that more Washington’s fault?

32

0.0

(0/4 – 4/4)

One Response to 2009 NFL Week 2 Beatpath Rankings

  1. JT says:

    Those Pittsburgh and Tennessee falls were exactly the type of thing that makes sense early in a season. I’d expect we’ll see a few more big leaps up and down by teams in the next few weeks as well.

    I kind of wonder where New England would be if Buffalo had managed to hold on at the end of the week 1 game. I suppose the answer is, “Below wherever Buffalo ended up.” But then you could play “what if” for just about any close game.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>